Loretta Lynch released a disturbing, and somewhat perplexing video earlier in this month, calling for people to bleed and die. In a seemingly veiled challenge to a populace still reeling from the unfulfilled promises of Barack Obama’s first term pledge of, “Hope and Change,” and his second term battle cry of, “Forward!” (How he even managed a second-term victory when it was apparent after his first four years that he possessed neither the experience to be the leader of the free world, nor the commitment to his constitutes, OUR country, or his oath; is questionable, at best…but that is a discussion for another time.)
His 2008 catch phrase of: “Hope and Change,” left us feeling, “Hopeless” and evidently the “Change” part referred to what was all we would have left in our pockets. But then, something happened…mass amnesia, voter fraud...(Did I say that?)…Because apparently we fell: hook, line, and sinker when he coined, “Forward!” as his 2012 slogan. It didn’t take long to realize we were definitely in the wrong gear.
Loretta Lynch seems to be encouraging the violent riots that have broken out after the election of President Donald Trump and calling for even further violence. Ironically, her assertion that, “this is a time of concern for people who see our rights being assailed, being trampled on, and even being rolled back,” seem more like projection on her part.
Projection is a theory in psychology in which humans defend themselves against their own unconscious impulses or qualities (both positive and negative) by denying their existence in themselves while attributing them to others. For example, a person who is habitually rude may constantly accuse other people of being rude. It incorporates blame shifting. Lets take a look at the text of her actual speech below:
0:01 I know that this is a time of great fear
0:02 and uncertainty for so many people I
0:04 know this is a time of concern for people who
0:06 see our rights being assailed, being
0:09 trampled on and even being rolled back
0:12 I know that this is difficult but
0:14 I remind you that this has never been easy
0:16 we have always had to work, to move this
0:19 country forward to achieve the great
0:21 ideals of our founding fathers, and that it has
0:24 been people, individuals who have banded
0:27 together, ordinary people who simply saw
0:30 what needed to be done and came together
0:32 and supported those ideals who have
0:34 made the difference
0:35 they’ve marched; they’ve bled; yes some of them
0:38 have died. This is hard, every good thing is
0:42 we have done this before we can do
0:45 this again.
https://youtu.be/5yYm3yNrxT4
What rights has President Trump assailed, trampled on or rolled back? Hmmmmm, if recent memory serves, it was obama who passed the NDAA in the middle of the night on New Years Eve 2011.
On December 31st 2011, US President Barack Obama signed into law the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 (NDAA). The Act was passed in the House of Representatives on May 26, 2011 by a vote of 322 to 96.
The Act was passed in the Senate on December 15, 2011 by a vote of 86 to 13. Below is an excerpt from the Act, the wording of which makes it legal to incarcerate United States citizens without recourse to any form of judicial process. Essentially these words say that if the government deems any person to have committed a “belligerent act” that person can be detained indefinitely without trial. [The law includes ALL OF US.]
Subtitle D — Counterterrorism
SEC. 1021. AFFIRMATION OF AUTHORITY OF THE ARMED FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES TO DETAIN COVERED PERSONS PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF MILITARY FORCE.
(a) IN GENERAL. — Congress affirms that the authority of the President to use all necessary and appropriate force pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107–40; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note) includes the authority for the Armed Forces of the United States to detain covered persons (as defined in subsection (b)) pending disposition under the law of war. ***{When is the US NOT in some “undeclared,” ‘conflict,’ somewhere?}***
(b) COVERED PERSONS. — A covered person under this section is any person as follows:
(1) A person who planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored those responsible for those attacks.
(2) A person who was a part of or substantially supported al-Qaeda, the Taliban, or associated forces that are engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners, including any person who has committed a belligerent act or has directly supported such hostilities in aid of such enemy forces.
(c) DISPOSITION UNDER LAW OF WAR. — The disposition of a person under the law of war as described in subsection (a) may include the following:
(1) Detention under the law of war without trial until the end of the hostilities authorized by the Authorization for Use of Military Force.
Why do you think the UN forces have been “occupying,” major cities in the States since BEFORE I’ve been back in the States (2015)? I believe you’re smart enough to figure out why.
original post at http://politicalpatrol.blogspot.com NEED A BLOGGER? I'M AVAILABLE TO BLOG FOR YOU. CONTACT ME AT THE ABOVE ADDRESS.
His 2008 catch phrase of: “Hope and Change,” left us feeling, “Hopeless” and evidently the “Change” part referred to what was all we would have left in our pockets. But then, something happened…mass amnesia, voter fraud...(Did I say that?)…Because apparently we fell: hook, line, and sinker when he coined, “Forward!” as his 2012 slogan. It didn’t take long to realize we were definitely in the wrong gear.
Loretta Lynch seems to be encouraging the violent riots that have broken out after the election of President Donald Trump and calling for even further violence. Ironically, her assertion that, “this is a time of concern for people who see our rights being assailed, being trampled on, and even being rolled back,” seem more like projection on her part.
Projection is a theory in psychology in which humans defend themselves against their own unconscious impulses or qualities (both positive and negative) by denying their existence in themselves while attributing them to others. For example, a person who is habitually rude may constantly accuse other people of being rude. It incorporates blame shifting. Lets take a look at the text of her actual speech below:
0:01 I know that this is a time of great fear
0:02 and uncertainty for so many people I
0:04 know this is a time of concern for people who
0:06 see our rights being assailed, being
0:09 trampled on and even being rolled back
0:12 I know that this is difficult but
0:14 I remind you that this has never been easy
0:16 we have always had to work, to move this
0:19 country forward to achieve the great
0:21 ideals of our founding fathers, and that it has
0:24 been people, individuals who have banded
0:27 together, ordinary people who simply saw
0:30 what needed to be done and came together
0:32 and supported those ideals who have
0:34 made the difference
0:35 they’ve marched; they’ve bled; yes some of them
0:38 have died. This is hard, every good thing is
0:42 we have done this before we can do
0:45 this again.
https://youtu.be/5yYm3yNrxT4
What rights has President Trump assailed, trampled on or rolled back? Hmmmmm, if recent memory serves, it was obama who passed the NDAA in the middle of the night on New Years Eve 2011.
On December 31st 2011, US President Barack Obama signed into law the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 (NDAA). The Act was passed in the House of Representatives on May 26, 2011 by a vote of 322 to 96.
The Act was passed in the Senate on December 15, 2011 by a vote of 86 to 13. Below is an excerpt from the Act, the wording of which makes it legal to incarcerate United States citizens without recourse to any form of judicial process. Essentially these words say that if the government deems any person to have committed a “belligerent act” that person can be detained indefinitely without trial. [The law includes ALL OF US.]
Subtitle D — Counterterrorism
SEC. 1021. AFFIRMATION OF AUTHORITY OF THE ARMED FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES TO DETAIN COVERED PERSONS PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF MILITARY FORCE.
(a) IN GENERAL. — Congress affirms that the authority of the President to use all necessary and appropriate force pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107–40; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note) includes the authority for the Armed Forces of the United States to detain covered persons (as defined in subsection (b)) pending disposition under the law of war. ***{When is the US NOT in some “undeclared,” ‘conflict,’ somewhere?}***
(b) COVERED PERSONS. — A covered person under this section is any person as follows:
(1) A person who planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored those responsible for those attacks.
(2) A person who was a part of or substantially supported al-Qaeda, the Taliban, or associated forces that are engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners, including any person who has committed a belligerent act or has directly supported such hostilities in aid of such enemy forces.
(c) DISPOSITION UNDER LAW OF WAR. — The disposition of a person under the law of war as described in subsection (a) may include the following:
(1) Detention under the law of war without trial until the end of the hostilities authorized by the Authorization for Use of Military Force.
Why do you think the UN forces have been “occupying,” major cities in the States since BEFORE I’ve been back in the States (2015)? I believe you’re smart enough to figure out why.
original post at http://politicalpatrol.blogspot.com NEED A BLOGGER? I'M AVAILABLE TO BLOG FOR YOU. CONTACT ME AT THE ABOVE ADDRESS.
